this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
203 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59641 readers
4214 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 62 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Fuck the music industry, but fuck AI made music even more. The goddamn robot is supposed to take my factory job and leave me with the time to write songs not the other way around

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org -1 points 5 months ago (5 children)

How do you feel about other tech-based tools making an artists life easier, like sequencers, VSTs, DAWs, and the like? I see it as maybe another tool to use.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 33 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With all of the tools you described the entire creative process is still done by a human musician. Sequencers have to be programmed. VSTs are just instruments and they DAWs have simply replaced expensive studio equipment so poors like me can produce a decent sounding track.

I don't want to see generated images or AI coded video games either.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

None of those tools has ever made a full releasable track for anyone, just like the tape machine never created music out of nowhere.

[–] myslsl@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Arguably a lot of these tools are designed specifically to reduce the effort a human has to put in to create the art they want to make too.

[–] myslsl@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You're getting downvoted but you are right. Stuff like this is a super cool example of exactly the type of thing you are talking about imo.

There's a lot of AI generated art that sucks. But that does not imply that in skilled hands an artist can't use those tools in creative/interesting ways.

[–] stellargmite@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Technicalities probably, but much like computery things in general these tools don't make all things easier necessarily. If pure making and playing of music is the goal, then just pickup an instrument. Record it with a nice preamp and microphone in an appropriate space. These tools allow many more and different options however. Of course I can approximate an orchestra good enough for low budget projects if not tv shows, without needing to hire an actual orchestra. And apply convolution reverb of the sistene chapel, or my bathroom. No complaints about the massive world of possibilities at our finger tips. But if I could hire a local school orchestra, the recording gear, and have an afternoon on such a project , it would be alot more fun than scrolling for hours for the right picollo flute sample, wrestling with licences (including cost) , upgrade hassles, and other tech headaches of this digital age. Back to my banjo. Saying all that I prefer when the tools mature into instruments and methods in their own right. e.g mpc sampling and performance, ableton live magic , and more. Plus its not all mutually exclusive. Do whats right for the art at the given time.

[–] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago

Valid question, fuck those downvoters.