Technology

59578 readers

3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

167

What everyone gets wrong about the 2015 Ashley Madison scandal (www.newscientist.com)

submitted 5 months ago by Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Found via the author's Mastodon Post

Generally, the media has focused on the (mainly) men whose names and desires were taken from the company’s subscriber database and shared with the world. [...] Ashley Madison was never really about that. Avid Life Media, its parent company, wasn’t in the business of sex, it was in the business of bots. Its site became a prototype for what social media platforms such as Facebook are becoming: places so packed with AI-generated nonsense that they feel like spam cages, or information prisons where the only messages that get through are auto-generated ads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 114 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I think a lot of dating sites are using bots or other means to push engagement at this point since online dating for women can be summed up like this:

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Fuck now I want a hot dog

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 54 points 5 months ago

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 20 points 5 months ago

How'd you get this picture of my Grindr DMs?

[–] wagesj45@kbin.run 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I remember online dating looking more like this from a male perspective.

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Back when I was in online dating (I got married in 2010, so it has been a very long time), this is how it seemed to work in the hetero arena:

Women (by which I mean, legitimate accounts from women who were actually looking for dates): Get 1,000,000 messages, approximately 999,900 of which are dick pics.
Men: See 1,000,000 ads, of which about 3 are legitimate people looking for dates.

So, both could be true in relation to the image.

I remember a guy once telling me that basically you have to respond to EVERY AD and hope something sticks. I never did that, and I felt bad for what the women must have had to deal with when I heard that. I had very limited success - dates with, at most, two or three women, and none of those really went anywhere. I ended up marrying someone from work instead.

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Straight dating online is like trying to find drinkable water in a crisis situation; women are stranded in the ocean, and men are stranded in the desert.

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Dude. You got 3 whole messages?

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Some kind of miracle, I know. Actually I got more messages, but many of them were either spam or never even made it to a date.

[–] wagesj45@kbin.run 4 points 5 months ago

Both definitely are true. I don't mean to indicate that one view is right. One feeds into the other. This is just he natural outcome when one sex is a sexual selector and one is not. I don't envy either group online dating, but for different reasons.