this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
450 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

4241 readers
9 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Worth noting, with the caveat that how criminals are treated could eventually become how everyone is treated on the right slippery slope:

provisions of his parole required him to surrender any electronic devices and passcodes

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Unfortunately the judge also ruled that it's no different than forcing someone to give their fingerprints when you book them. If this sets a precedent, it could apply to anyone getting arrested, not just parolees / prior convicts.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Ole Donnie T is technically in parole right now. Would love to see this provision applied in that case.

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 2 points 5 months ago

Wow, that is supremely fucked up. Parole shouldn't require breaching the privacy of anyone who has conversation history stored on the parolee's devices.