this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
441 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

11148 readers
1962 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek was the first person to observe microbes. Semmelweis deserves immense credit for trying to convince people to wash their hands, but he didn't observe microbes and believed in corpse particles. (⌐■_■)

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah. I was telling a fib for comedic effect. Semmelweis is actually a lot more impressive, to me, because he was able to deduce that something important was going on and what the solution was, without having any idea what the mechanism might be, simply from observing and following the data. He didn't need to know the details to know it was a problem; he just trusted the evidence without needing to have a narrative built up in his head to attach it to.

Also, once he realized it was killing people, he wouldn't shut up about it until they literally had to kill him to make him stop. That puts him over the line from good scientist to hero, to me.

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not arguing with that, but clearly people seem to believe you and think he discovered microbes, which he didn't. The truth is more impressive anyways, no?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I edited it to add a correction. I shouldn't fib for the sake of making a more entertaining link to the posting, maybe.

[–] Lizardking27@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Maybe strikethrough the first part where you credit semmelweis with the discovery. And no, a convenient lie is never better than a complicated truth. It may seem harmless to you but you've just created misinformation and disseminated it to the public.

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Cheers, comrade.