this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
79 points (96.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43601 readers
1262 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Interpret 'hardest' however suits you. Look forward to your answers!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Weapons are a human right, completely independent of anything about rebellions or keeping the government in check.

Individually, if you prevent a person from carrying a weapon when they’re in a dangerous situation, it’s like locking them into a cage with a hungry tiger in it.

It’s perfectly natural for a person to be able to reach out and pick up a weapon. To block someone from this takes active effort.

And if that person is in a dangerous situation, and you make that effort to prevent them from being armed, you’re actively violating their rights.

[–] Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago

I'm taking the other comment about not arguing with stupid people.

load more comments (3 replies)