this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
469 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39165 readers
2480 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A controversy over a waterfall has cascaded into a social media storm in China, even prompting an explanation from the water body itself.

A hiker posted a video that showed the flow of water from Yuntai Mountain Waterfall - billed as China's tallest uninterrupted waterfall - was coming from a pipe built high into the rock face.

The clip has been liked more than 70,000 times since it was first posted on Monday. Operators of the Yuntai tourism park said that they made the "small enhancement" during the dry season so visitors would feel that their trip had been worthwhile.

"The one about how I went through all the hardship to the source of Yuntai Waterfall only to see a pipe," the caption of the video posted by user "Farisvov" reads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rinox@feddit.it 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes in the sense that all communist countries are state capitalism, no in the sense that it betrays the very ideology of communism.

If you think about it it's very much the same structure as a big business, with the "boss" at the very top, the party being the shareholders and executives swallowing all the profits and at the bottom are all the workers getting the shaft.

The main differences with normal capitalism is that the state here has an army, police and a full monopoly, so the party can literally do whatever they want to whoever they want within China. They don't play by the rules, they write the rules, ie, a capitalist wet dream.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -5 points 5 months ago (6 children)

If every time comminism is tried, it turns into one specific bad thing, then wouldnt that mean that communism is inherently flawed?

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 5 points 5 months ago

Maybe ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

I don't think so, no. If anything it shows it's difficult to achieve.

[–] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ignoring whatever semantic arguments about socialism and communism, it's easier to just point out that statement isn't true.

Employee-owned businesses are socialist - in the actual definition of socialism where capital is owned by the workers. They work fine, maybe even better than capitalist businesses.

Fire departments are socialist - in a slightly different definition where a non-capital resource is owned by a community. They definitely work better than the capitalist versions that used to exist.

The problem with saying anything communist always fails is that they only call it communism when it fails. When it succeeds they just call it something else.

[–] skulblaka@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

If every time someone is born, they die, then wouldn't that mean that life is inherently worthless?

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

True Communism has never been tried on a large scale. It's always authoritarians calling themselves Communist.

But yes, it is flawed in that humans are too tribal for it to work on a large scale.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Did you really just a "not true communism"?

I swear tankies are a meme.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I thought tankies are the ones who like the "not true communisms" of authoritarian countries. It seems to be becoming a general "person I disagree with" term nowadays. Do they usually say Communism is flawed?

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not necessarily, it could just mean that the vast majority of the time it would be legitimately implemented, a larger country that doesn't like communism spends a lot of time and money interfering with it

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Russia and China are plenty big.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if there's a reason why I said "the vast majority" and "legitimately implemented"

Nah I'm sure I only picked those words because they sound nice

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you cant survive with the support of china behind you, your system is shit

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In this very thread, like six parent comments up, it was already established that China is not communist

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And I stated that state capitalism is communism by another name.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

And I said you're wrong, because it's not. Let's just agree that you're wrong and stop wasting 1s and 0s