this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
539 points (90.4% liked)

World News

38839 readers
1863 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Terrorism is explicitly killing done without military targets in mind. It's explicitly political, and targeted at civilians, to instill terror.

I'm sorry you don't like the definition of the word, but it is the definition of the word.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s explicitly political, and targeted at civilians, to instill terror.

like police shooting black men

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No that's just good old fashioned racism combined with stupidly poor recruiting and training practices.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

make any excuse you want: it fits the definition you gave

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really doesn't, but you'll never care about reason anyway. You're just another edgelord.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

call me any names you want,: you're the one whose definition of terrorist includes cops

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes I am aware that I am correct.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SCB@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No I'm not. I don't even have context because I don't care, but I don't change opinions easily because I'm almost always right

Terrorism is explicitly killing done without military targets in mind.

like police shooting black men

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m sorry you don’t like the definition of the word, but it is the definition of the word.

it's loaded language. i know what the definition is, but using it only means you don't like the politics of the killers.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it means they're doing things that fit the definition.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

being loaded language, using it actually means what I said.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every member of Hamas is likely going to die like the terrorist scum they are, and the world will be a markedly better place for it

Nothing you say will change that fact.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Every member of Hamas is likely going to die like the terrorist scum they are, and the world will be a markedly better place for it

the phrasing makes me think you think this hurdtmy feelings. in truth it just shows your too small minded to understand why terrorist use a meaningless label

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't care about your feelings. I care about dead terrorists.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

again: terrorist isn't a meaningful epithet.

but you do seem obsessed with my feelings

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No I don't even know who you are. I've never read your screen name. You could be the initial person I responded to or just some other idiot terrorist sympathizer.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no one is sympathising with terrorists for any objective application of the label, because objective application of that label is impossible.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it's pretty easy. When you force your way into a place specifically to murder civilians with no other goal other than to spread terror, you're a terrorist.

You agreeing with terrorists makes you a bad person, it doesn't make them "not terrorists."

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

terrorist isn't an objective label, no matter how much emotionally charged language you use. what you described is murder. calling it terrorism is a political position.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this isn't a refutation. it's an appeal to ridicule.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes that is what your every post deserves

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

it's a fallacious argument that doesn't undermine my actual position at all, it just betrays a lack of ability or interest to engage with intellectual honesty.