this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
502 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

59641 readers
2548 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AI isn't paying off if you're too dumb to figure out how to use the many amazing tools that have come about.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I was going to say...I use AI-transcription tools for video editing, AI-upscaling, and Resolve dropped an incredible AI green screen tool that makes it effortless. I also use AI to repair audio as of 6mo ago lol. I don't think I gone more than 48hrs without using an AI tool professionally.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if “AI not paying off” in the context of this article actually means “Companies haven’t been able to lay off a bunch of their staff yet, like they’re hoping to do”

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If anyone read the article you'd know what they meant, and it wasn't either of the things you two mentioned.

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I know exactly what the journalist meant. They meant to get more clicks with some click bait headline and a bad article that will make them look extremely stupid in the future.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

It's about MASSIVE CARBON FOOTPRINT and a waning userbase

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea I didn’t read it. But isn’t it safe to assume that this is a major goal for many companies?

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry to - hey wait a minute

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

AI is a lot more like the Internet than it is like Facebook. It's a set of techniques you can use to create tools. These are incredibly useful tools, but you're not going to make Facebook money off of them because the techniques are pretty easy to replicate and the genie is out of the bottle.

What the tech bros are looking for is a way to control access to AI so they can be a chokepoint. Like if Craftsman could charge for every single time you used their tool to make something. For one very recent example, see what happened to Unity. Creating chokepoints and then collecting rent is the modern corporate feudal strategy, but that won't work if everybody with an AWS account and enough money can spin up an LLM and start training it.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is this AI tool to repair audio? Would it be able to fix poorly compressed audio?

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes I use it all the time. Adobe Audio Enhance. It’s the flagship feature of their upcoming podcast app, but you can use it in browser currently. If you have an adobe subscription, it doesn’t charge extra or anything. It’s only for spoken word though, not music. If you throw music on it, though, you get some pretty wild stuff as it tries to create words out of the sounds.

To further answer your question, yes, it is actually very good with highly compressed audio. I regularly feed it zoom audio to make more intelligible. Obviously there are always limits, but I assure you it can do more than you can manually 85% of the time and buy a large margin. My only frustration is it is a simple slider, you can’t really fine tune it, but it’s still incredibly effective and I often use it as a first pass on the original audio file before I even start editing.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

AI stem splitting for songs is magical as well

[–] mPony@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@BolexForSoup can you recommend a good quality Upscaler ?

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Topaz Labs makes a decent one. You’ll need to do a lot of trial and error to kind of find your own favorite settings for baking, but as far as cost and efficacy go, there aren’t a lot better out right now.

They do a watermark free version You can test with. I think it also only let you do a couple of minutes a video at a time. But frankly it’s incredibly processor intensive so you will only want to test a 15-20s clip at a time anyway.

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

The problem here is that AI in the media has become synonymous with generalized LLMs, while other "AI" applications have been in place for many years doing more specific things that have more obvious use cases that can be more easily commercialised.