this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
854 points (97.2% liked)

Not The Onion

12388 readers
1201 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 122 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Cop literally wants a convicted felon to run the country, I can't come up with a better satire for how little police care about rule of law... Or a better argument for the "Ban the Box" initiative

I'm definitely all for loosening restrictions on former felons.. Look bro, if we can have a convicted felon running for office, no reason why they can't vote or hold jobs if they've done their time right?

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

This sheriff would need to check the color of their hat before he agrees or not. And the color of their skin.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I couldn't own firearms or vote but this motherfucker could be president? Literally makes no sense and moreso if you read the reasoning as to why voting rights and firearm right can be restricted.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_death

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Cant/won't provide identifiable information.

[–] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

to be fair, he was attempting satire -- he is 'switching sides' and now wants a felon to run the country.

They're so bad at everything lol WOOSH on satire

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

if we can have a convicted felon running for office, no reason why they can’t vote or hold jobs if they’ve done their time right?

That's a fair point: Once Trump has done his time then he can run for president.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

There's precedent....pretty sure Wyatt Earp was a felon

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah, the important distinction here is that he doesn't want just any convicted felon on the throne. I am pretty sure his list of convicted felons he'd like to see elected contains a single name that rhymes with Honald Frump.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Okay, but why is Ronald Klump even being considered for the job? I didn't think he was running....

Wait did you mean the guy with 34 felonies?

34 felonies so far.

[–] MockingMoniker@lemmy.world -4 points 5 months ago

Maybe you don't understand the important facts.