this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
55 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

7218 readers
384 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
55
Long delays and collapsed cases are eroding faith in the justice system, lawyers warn (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 5 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Two and a half years after Norman Tate's son was killed in a car accident, he's still struggling to come to terms with how the justice system handled the aftermath.

"If you step forward inside that place, you're flipping a coin — whether you're going to get justice that day or not," he said on April 30, standing outside the Ontario Court of Justice in Brantford, Ont.

Norman Tate Junior was killed in a head-on collision a week before Christmas in 2021. The driver in the other car eventually was charged with impaired driving causing death and bodily harm. But the case crawled through the court system and was stayed after it breached the time limits for trials set in a 2016 Supreme Court decision.

That decision in R. v. Jordan established that criminal cases that go beyond those time limits — 18 months for provincial courts and 30 months for superior courts — can be stayed for unreasonable delay.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I've actually never thought of that solution -- here I was all set to snark something like "get more judges", but your comment was the first one I saw; and rightfully so!

A triage is actually a bizarrely simple idea that I'm embarrassed I didn't think of it, even as a person of middling intellect.

There's got to be some reason why we don't triage this way, though, or my faith in the system is at least such that I feel we should have moved to a triage long ago. Would it unjustly allow petty thieves out the revolving door to offend again and again? We have that now, and there's a lot of outcry in urban centers where repeat offenders not getting punished is endemic.

If we created a second track for 'lesser', victimless-type cases, and used that as offer for newer prosecutors and judges, would that help? Would a lower court of newbies be appropriate and workable? It's pipelining, but in court.

But even that idea sounds ooky. But I know you're onto something. I'm sure of it.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 4 points 5 months ago

When you think about it, triage in medicine is also not an ideal solution. Ideally, in both medicine and law, the system would have enough capacity to deal with everyone in strict first-in-first-out order without anyone being harmed. In the absence of that capacity, we have to decide which cases to look at first somehow, and FIFO doesn't appear to be the best basis for making that decision.

We need more judges too, but even if we were to somehow force legislators to select them this instant, some cases would end up getting dropped before the backlog got caught up. I'd much prefer that they were things like solicitation, small-amount drug posession, and minor traffic violations—not petty theft if we can help it, since that isn't a victimless crime, but I'd nevertheless rather have ten petty theft cases dropped than one assault case that landed someone in the hospital.

It's a flawed solution for a flawed world.