politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Your point would be correct if you didn’t go around Lemmy labeling everyone as centrists.
Actual centrists love the guy.
A lot of very vocal people on the online left (particularly those around here on Lemmy and twitter) love to scream that they are the true leftist and all others are centrist or worse liberals. (I'm sure you've seen people "on the left" calling people they don't like liberals around here, I see it all the time. They use it in the same breath of calling people fascist.)
It's stupid as hell and is so prevalent that it seems like an organized effort to make leftist spaces online unfriendly to leftist so that they can't actually unite on anything.
Liberals are not the same as fascists or conservatives. They are preferable to either.
But not as good as leftists.
Depends on how far left. Three lefts make a right, and I won’t stand for that
Absolutely on point. I actively debate with these knuckleheads to substantiate counterpoint for the more passive users. There’s no changing their minds, but I’m not leaving disinformation unchallenged just to linger and create misinformation through others.
Based take and something I try to do as well but there's so fuckin many of them out there.
It's like trying to walk up a raging river at times.
We all need to work together.
Many of those are fascists or authoritarians cosplaying as leftists.
"Everyone to my left is all the way to my right."
You're one of the ones who have inconsistent and conflicting viewpoints depending on the topic tho.
Lemmy has a few folks that like to label anyone being pragmatic as a “centrist.”
Anyone that looks at West Virginian’s voting records for federal, state, and local offices knows that Joe Manchin’s seat is almost certainly going Republican in 2024.
I only like Manchin because his existence helps put Chuck Schumer on top of the senate.
I've argued for years that while I don't like Manchin personally, he is far superior to any Republican he has run against.
He votes for the good of the country more often than "centrist" Republicans like john McCain or Lisa Murkowski ever have. He has been a blessing to this country and the world.
I don't know about "blessing" but he certainly is preferable to Senate Majority Leader McConnell.
I’ll say this, even if he voted against the party 100% of the time, anyone that caucuses with the DNC if a vote toward giving Chuck the gavel. That means no stupid Biden impeachment trials, no brining dumb legislation to the floor that won’t get signed, etc etc.
In 6 months Manchin is likely to be replaced with a GOP candidate who supports Trump’s coup attempt. That was always the alternative to Manchin, not some sort of West Virginian Bernie Sanders.
And no end of people who only punch left but call themselves pragmatists.
If you’ve got a way to ensure that West Virginia’s newly opening seat is filled by someone more progressive than Manchin, we’re all ears. A lot of us would love that.
Right now Governor Jim Justice (R), a coup supporter who just banned abortion for all stages of pregnancy, is polling at 60 to 70% for Manchin’s seat.
I haven’t heard any alternative solutions out of you.
Supporting Manchin isn't doing the trick either, is it?
Once again, in the spirit of an actual constructive conversation, how would you get someone more progressive into a West Virginia federal senatorial seat?
How would you pull that off in a state where the guy banning abortions is winning by massive margin in the current race?
Why is your arbitrary bullshit goal the one I need to meet before I can level any criticism at your god?
Manchin is leaving the senate because he knows he will lose if he runs again. Moving to the right has failed. Democrats have no one who can win they can run in that state. There's none to Manchin's right.
So who would you run for that seat? You can't run Manchin, he can't win anymore and even he knows it.
I would work on getting progressives elected in better states. Manchin is wet dogshit on his single best day, and it's why centrists will always go to bat for him.
Exactly. And I’m just saying that it’s pragmatic to also get less extreme conservatives elected in conservative states while also getting real progressives elected in better states. You do both and take anything that moves the needle toward progress.
Waste of a perfectly good explanation, but I'm with you here.
Gatekeeping centrism. That's a new one.
If you stopped using your own perspective to define and belittle others, they’d be more likely to consider your opinions. Just food for thought.