this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
146 points (100.0% liked)

196

16579 readers
1943 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What even is this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] janNatan@lemmy.ml 86 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

This is the "Lagrangian standard model" - the mathematical formula explaining basically all physics as we know it.

https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/the-deconstructed-standard-model-equation?language_content_entity=und

When you DON'T assume spherical chickens in a vacuum, this is what you gotta calculate.

[–] don@lemm.ee 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

assume spherical chickens in a vacuum

lol that’s the next multiverse over, our solution works only with spherical cows in a vacuum.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh man, that' explains it. I've been using spherical swallows, which are roughly coconut sized. So really just use coconut maths.

[–] don@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

lol yfw you realize you coulda just used cubic swallows and called it a day

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Cubic african or european swallows?

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago

Either or works, we're not that precise

[–] FrenziedFelidFanatic@yiffit.net 21 points 6 months ago

The SM is half the puzzle. The other half being Einstein’s field equations (which, despite the beautiful notation, are just as complex). Also, I will note that there are some spherical chickens in this equation as well—like massless neutrinos.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Well, it's a weightless chicken at least, because this model's got no gravity.

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago

Okay, that's actually quite impressive