this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
467 points (92.2% liked)

World News

39395 readers
1969 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Hydrogen and Methane Power-to-gas can store more power for longer than hydro pump

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’m not sure why you’re getting downvoted, but companies are looking to use hydrogen fuel cells for 18 wheelers for just this reason. They won’t have to stop for gas even on long trips because the energy density is very high and the weight is less.

Here are a few charts about it from the DOE: https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/articles/fuel-cell-and-battery-electric-vehicles-compared

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

The downvotes are because almost all of the global hydrogen production is made either with natural gas, as a byproduct of oil drilling or through coal.

In its current state, it is a fake green product pushed by the oil industry to hamper the transition.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago

Ah - that makes sense, thank you. You’re correct, but I work in the aerospace industry with hydrogen fuel cells and green hydrogen is all I’m familiar with, but I realize now that this was bias on my part.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Is hydrolysis not cost-effective? If we have excess electricity, as in this case, can we not use that to get hydrogen?

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

On the recent lemmy topic of using up votes and down votes incorrectly.

Literally just stating a verifiable fact, not in support or against the technology, and I get down voted lol.

[–] MicrondeMMMMMMM@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

huh i hadn't heard of this one? I went to a dam last year and that's what the guide told us...

[–] bobburger@fedia.io 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think it's the physical size of the reservoir that is the limiting factor. You can't reasonable expand most reservoirs, but it's relatively easy to create new hydrogen/methane storage tanks.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 2 points 7 months ago

Yes but pumped storage is about 80% round trip efficiency vs power to x which is barely touching 20% out of the lab. And power to X needs an epic fuckton of very clean water, which also isn’t easy to find.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 1 points 7 months ago

At huge inefficiency loss though. Denmark is probably further with this than anywhere else in the world and even they are sputtering on getting this going.