this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
427 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

11130 readers
3063 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
427
Name & shame. :) (mander.xyz)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 67 points 6 months ago (2 children)

To me, this is a major ethical issue. If any actual humans submitted this “paper”, they should be severely disciplined by their ethics board.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 74 points 6 months ago (2 children)

But the publisher who published it should be liable too. Wtf is their job then? Parasiting off of public funded research?

[–] plantedworld@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bitfucker knew that was rhetorical.

[–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 9 points 6 months ago

I can't tell if this question is rhetorical.

[–] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

Research journals are often rated for the quality of the content they publish. My guess is that this "journal" is just shit. If you're a student or researcher, you will come across shit like this and you should be smart enough to tell when something is poor quality.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago