this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
640 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2302 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 107 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The helicopter was an old American Bell, stopped production decades ago and parts are hard enough to come by. Sanctions work, they just manifest in mysterious ways such as this and Iran's terrible aviation service record in general.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 30 points 6 months ago

Instead of getting old fighter jets from Russia for those drones they sent, they'd probably have been better-off getting civilian helicopters.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Cue conspiracy on a CIA plan that took 50 years to yield results.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"So hear me out, we place a bomb in one of the Hueys and then stop supplying them with new ones, one day their leader will totally get on it and then we got em"

"Yo bill maybe slow down on the company acid please."

[–] oce@jlai.lu 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Too obvious. More like, "We're going to use slightly less lubricated ball bearings, position the aircraft on the market just where they will buy it, the maintenance specificity will not be documented, and it should kill a couple of important people in 50 years!". (Loosely inspired by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet)

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I'm not sure the CIA was doing stuff as advanced as Stuxnet in its LSD days when it was supplying Iran.

Though now that you mention it, I'm surprised we've never heard of the CIA doing more things like obscure Stuxnet style sabotage on leaders' aircraft and the like.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Hey man do you want it done fast or do you want it done right?

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 months ago

it must have been delivered before 1978