this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
227 points (96.7% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2720 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You just need to paint it way to justify the completely unjustifiable position of thinking individuals should be punished for the actions of their state.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Let me break it down for you:

Top level poster was saying noone in the us gets a break, so these people from the us should not get a break.

They think that because the us has bad policies, these people should be punished.

Their position had less ( or even nothing ) to do with whether these actions should be punishable because they themselves are bad, their position is about them being punished as some kind of pay back for us policy.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nope, this is a deliberate mischaracterization of the argument.

It goes like this:

1 - you're not supposed to fly with loose ammo.

2 - many countries prohibit you visiting with ammunition.

3 - if you break a foreign nations laws, that nation can and will imprison you.

not calculus, it's pretty fucking simple.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I can easily follow that logic and I get it. The whole point is that the poster is arguing they deserve to be punished by arguing that people would be punished by the us system. What the us system does or does not do has zero bearing on whether this is just.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

ok, think of it this way then:

they went out of their way to patronize a country that does NOT invite firearms-tourism. why weren't they smart enough or patriotic bang bang enough to travel someplace they could bring their stuff to?

tsk. poor decision making by them, poor judgement by the gun lovers in this thread who would see them skate on their crimes.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I couldn't care less why they weren't smart enough. I'm okay with them being punished for it, but in these cases a fine seems more reasonable than a decade in prison.

by the gun lovers in this thread who would see them skate on their crimes.

I'm for pretty strict gun control. You are exposing yourself here: this isn't about being reasonable, it's about some vengefulness against gun owners. Get out of your black and white thinking and taking sides and be objective.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

how'bout, no?

you do you mate.