this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
271 points (89.7% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2623 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, that justifies threatening a child with death.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, not after he's been subdued.

Home invasions are inherent threats though.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In Canada I don't think you can threaten it either way since you can't legally protect you property with force unless force is used on you.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That sounds like a good way to get shot first in a country that has its own fair share of guns, not even getting into the fact that violence always favors the aggressor.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're talking legally not morally boss.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And I'm talking about the implications of that law as presented.

Hopefully it's a bit more contextual than that.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's the same in most civilized countries. You can sit on the guy to hold him down, you can punch if punched, stab if you see a knife, shoot if you see a gun. You can't however use disparit force if they slap you can't behead.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Last I checked Canada is safer than the U.S.

Quick numbers I could find

"Between 2003 and 2007, approximately 2.1 million household burglaries were reported to the FBI each year on average. Household burglaries ending in homicide made up 0.004% of all burglaries during that period."

So now add in all those home invasions that didn't get reported for a number of reasons and I would say they are very low risk. Pulling a gun will increase the danger.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sources need links or at least the actual name of the source, not just quotation marks.

Not sure why you're talking about the FBI after your previous statement, but home invasions by definition are when an occupant is at home. Most robberies are committed when the house is empty specifically to avoid the possibility of conflict.

Robberies are a property crime.

Invasions are a threat.