this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23164 readers
2757 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A growing number of Americans are ending up homeless as soaring rents in recent years squeeze their budgets.

According to a Jan. 25 report from Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies, roughly 653,000 people reported experiencing homelessness in January of 2023, up roughly 12% from the same time a year prior and 48% from 2015. That marks the largest single-year increase in the country's unhoused population on record, Harvard researchers said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Landlords: “Cool. How are you going to be able to stop us?”

He supposedly loves unions, right? How about he starts throwing his support behind tenant unions and rent strikes? How about he tells the millions of Democrats to take political and economic actions against landlords and real estate companies? "Here are your enemies and these are their companies, you know what to do."

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think you may be misunderstanding who has all the money and all the high-priced lawyers in this equation.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bosses have money and high-priced lawyers, workers can beat them anyway. A strong tenant union can beat a landlord just the same.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, okay. The last time I lived in an apartment building, there were six tenants. If we had tried to form a union, we would have just been kicked out because we lived in a desirable area of L.A. and he could have charged new tenants more. Should we have added ourselves to the record number of homeless so this plan of yours can come to fruition? How about all the people in single-occupancy dwellings that are renting? Should they form a tenant union of one? Do you think that would work?

It's like you think every renter lives in a high-rise.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's like you think the wider national union wouldn't bother to help a little group of six tenants. You're basically arguing we shouldn't bother with labor unions because not everyone works in a factory.

If your six neighbors joined a union to collectively bargain, it wouldn't be a union of six people! You'd just be one small part of the broader union, which has the resources to hire lawyers and pressure the landlord.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How could they help a group of six tenants?

How could they work with single-occupancy renters?

What would stop the landlord from just kicking those people out? Do you think people can just refuse to pay rent until their demands are met? Because it doesn't work like that anywhere.

You're basically asking for people to be forcibly dragged out of their homes by cops and then becoming homeless.

Finally- what have you done about this? Have you unionized any tenants anywhere? Have you risked getting kicked out of your own home? Otherwise, this sounds very much like "some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I'm willing to make."

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When the UAW negotiates for higher wages, that raises wages for everyone else even when they're un-unionized. A rising tide lifts all boats. That's how you help single-occupancy renters.

It would also help if blue states would pass more tenant's rights laws to keep landlords from evicting people, and Biden could use the bully pulpit to push those forward. You're seemingly ignoring that we were talking about tenant unions with a national spotlight. Surely you realize that would be different, right? A shitty landlord would get national attention and be forced to bargain by public pressure, and Biden could help. Sure, some landlords would be basically untouchable (single-occupancy renters and such) but enough could be pressured to effect the market.

All of this is besides the point! I said that Biden could support tenant unions to help fight homelessness and unaffordable rents. Do you disagree with this basic premise?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You have not answered any of my questions. I asked you multiple questions and you didn't answer a single one. Not even the one where I asked you what you personally have done about unionizing renters.

So I have no idea why you think I would answer your question.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I did!

How could they help a group of six tenants?

How could they work with single-occupancy renters?

When the UAW negotiates for higher wages, that raises wages for everyone else even when they’re un-unionized. A rising tide lifts all boats. That’s how you help single-occupancy renters.

And then

What would stop the landlord from just kicking those people out?

It would also help if blue states would pass more tenant’s rights laws to keep landlords from evicting people, and Biden could use the bully pulpit to push those forward. You’re seemingly ignoring that we were talking about tenant unions with a national spotlight. Surely you realize that would be different, right? A shitty landlord would get national attention and be forced to bargain by public pressure, and Biden could help. Sure, some landlords would be basically untouchable (single-occupancy renters and such) but enough could be pressured to effect the market.

And then

Finally- what have you done about this?

Now this one I didn't answer this because it seemed irrelevant. I'm not the god damn president of the United States. That's what we're talking about. I don't matter and trying to drag me in as if I am as responsible for the lack of tenant organizing as Joe Biden is absurd.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I see. So the responsibility for this rests solely on Biden's shoulders and you don't have to do anything but talk about it on the internet. Convenient.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago

🙄

Some responsibility rests on Biden's shoulders, far more than on mine or yours. You're seemingly absolving him, as if blaming him for anything is wrong.