this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23164 readers
2844 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A growing number of Americans are ending up homeless as soaring rents in recent years squeeze their budgets.

According to a Jan. 25 report from Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies, roughly 653,000 people reported experiencing homelessness in January of 2023, up roughly 12% from the same time a year prior and 48% from 2015. That marks the largest single-year increase in the country's unhoused population on record, Harvard researchers said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (63 children)
[–] fenynro@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You cracked the case!

It wasn't anything like coordinated rent increases from large groups of landlords using a pricing app, it wasn't a worldwide pandemic disrupting the market, it wasn't America keeping housing as an investment vehicle instead of a means of sheltering humans, it wasn't decades of wealthy investors buying housing to convert into rentals.

Nope, all of that complexity can be tossed out the window because one single man is to blame: Joe Biden. All in his first term as president too!

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It wasn’t anything like coordinated rent increases from large groups of landlords using a pricing app

Which Biden has no interest in doing anything about. Why isn't he using the bully pulpit to name and shame enemies of his administration?

it wasn’t a worldwide pandemic disrupting the market,

It's been years since you and the rest of Democrats gave a shit about COVID, so it's hypocritical to blame the ongoing pandemic.

Perhaps if Biden didn't give up entirely on public health then the ongoing economic problems caused by COVID could be addressed, but instead we don't even talk about it like it's still a serious issue and ignore the ongoing wave of deaths. We are still having excess deaths far above the pre-pandemic period, but I bet you don't even wear a mask to the store. What a joke.

it wasn’t America keeping housing as an investment vehicle instead of a means of sheltering humans, it wasn’t decades of wealthy investors buying housing to convert into rentals.

Both problems are something Biden helped establish over his long tenure as a Senator.

Nope, all of that complexity can be tossed out the window because one single man is to blame: Joe Biden.

Liberals in every country do this thing where they use complexity as a way to mystify and obscure the consequences of their party's actions and inaction. Somehow the President is powerless and problems come from nowhere. No one is to blame, except maybe the red team.

[–] stembolts@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Both parties are neolibs.

It's just a duopoly.

All of your critiques apply to both parties.

I'm left so I hate right.

I'm right so I hate left.

So boring.

Introduce ranked choice voting.

We could hate omnidirectionally.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There is no left.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you think you make any sort of sense with this way of writing? You are slamming Biden because you don't know who is a actually responsible. It's greedy landlords and the corporate overlords that run housing.

Biden runs the country. Not the whole housing market. If anything he helped it with his administration relieving college debt and made it more affordable to many Americans that don't need to pay off debt.

You make zero points and I just throwing mud to make Trump the only choice.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Biden runs the country. Not the whole housing market.

He definitely could interfere with the housing market to a much higher degree. He could also make better use of the bully pulpit to attack greedy landlords and corporate housing by name.

He will not.

When Trump wins he will make everything worse and Biden is doing everything he can to make sure he loses.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He could also make better use of the bully pulpit to attack greedy landlords and corporate housing by name.

Biden: "You landlords are terrible and charge too much! Here are your names!"

Landlords: "Cool. How are you going to be able to stop us?"

Biden: "..."

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Landlords: “Cool. How are you going to be able to stop us?”

He supposedly loves unions, right? How about he starts throwing his support behind tenant unions and rent strikes? How about he tells the millions of Democrats to take political and economic actions against landlords and real estate companies? "Here are your enemies and these are their companies, you know what to do."

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think you may be misunderstanding who has all the money and all the high-priced lawyers in this equation.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bosses have money and high-priced lawyers, workers can beat them anyway. A strong tenant union can beat a landlord just the same.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, okay. The last time I lived in an apartment building, there were six tenants. If we had tried to form a union, we would have just been kicked out because we lived in a desirable area of L.A. and he could have charged new tenants more. Should we have added ourselves to the record number of homeless so this plan of yours can come to fruition? How about all the people in single-occupancy dwellings that are renting? Should they form a tenant union of one? Do you think that would work?

It's like you think every renter lives in a high-rise.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's like you think the wider national union wouldn't bother to help a little group of six tenants. You're basically arguing we shouldn't bother with labor unions because not everyone works in a factory.

If your six neighbors joined a union to collectively bargain, it wouldn't be a union of six people! You'd just be one small part of the broader union, which has the resources to hire lawyers and pressure the landlord.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How could they help a group of six tenants?

How could they work with single-occupancy renters?

What would stop the landlord from just kicking those people out? Do you think people can just refuse to pay rent until their demands are met? Because it doesn't work like that anywhere.

You're basically asking for people to be forcibly dragged out of their homes by cops and then becoming homeless.

Finally- what have you done about this? Have you unionized any tenants anywhere? Have you risked getting kicked out of your own home? Otherwise, this sounds very much like "some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I'm willing to make."

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When the UAW negotiates for higher wages, that raises wages for everyone else even when they're un-unionized. A rising tide lifts all boats. That's how you help single-occupancy renters.

It would also help if blue states would pass more tenant's rights laws to keep landlords from evicting people, and Biden could use the bully pulpit to push those forward. You're seemingly ignoring that we were talking about tenant unions with a national spotlight. Surely you realize that would be different, right? A shitty landlord would get national attention and be forced to bargain by public pressure, and Biden could help. Sure, some landlords would be basically untouchable (single-occupancy renters and such) but enough could be pressured to effect the market.

All of this is besides the point! I said that Biden could support tenant unions to help fight homelessness and unaffordable rents. Do you disagree with this basic premise?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You have not answered any of my questions. I asked you multiple questions and you didn't answer a single one. Not even the one where I asked you what you personally have done about unionizing renters.

So I have no idea why you think I would answer your question.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I did!

How could they help a group of six tenants?

How could they work with single-occupancy renters?

When the UAW negotiates for higher wages, that raises wages for everyone else even when they’re un-unionized. A rising tide lifts all boats. That’s how you help single-occupancy renters.

And then

What would stop the landlord from just kicking those people out?

It would also help if blue states would pass more tenant’s rights laws to keep landlords from evicting people, and Biden could use the bully pulpit to push those forward. You’re seemingly ignoring that we were talking about tenant unions with a national spotlight. Surely you realize that would be different, right? A shitty landlord would get national attention and be forced to bargain by public pressure, and Biden could help. Sure, some landlords would be basically untouchable (single-occupancy renters and such) but enough could be pressured to effect the market.

And then

Finally- what have you done about this?

Now this one I didn't answer this because it seemed irrelevant. I'm not the god damn president of the United States. That's what we're talking about. I don't matter and trying to drag me in as if I am as responsible for the lack of tenant organizing as Joe Biden is absurd.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I see. So the responsibility for this rests solely on Biden's shoulders and you don't have to do anything but talk about it on the internet. Convenient.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago

🙄

Some responsibility rests on Biden's shoulders, far more than on mine or yours. You're seemingly absolving him, as if blaming him for anything is wrong.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can what if all day long. And it's not fact. It's fantasy. So you don't make sense in two posts. Keep going. Your whole account can look like a lost soul in a cult.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A cult of what? I'm just criticizing Biden! You seem to think the president is powerless and nothing that has gone wrong is his fault.

Is there literally anything you would criticize him for?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not to you. Because you are Trump's nuts and are a sad excuse for an American.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

So you're hostile to outsiders and blindly support Blue Leader no matter what?

Remember, I never told anyone how to vote. If someone wants to vote for Biden that is their business and I completely understand it. You, on the other hand, attack anyone who even criticizes Biden.

Sounds like I'm not the one in a cult. Good luck Blue MAGA

[–] fenynro@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's interesting to see the assumptions and projections you put onto me. All I've said (or implied snarkily) is that the housing and homelessness crisis that we're seeing in America is a multifaceted issue, and much larger than trying to simply blame one man.

For what it's worth, I have no love for Biden and think he could be doing a hell of a lot more from his position, as could the rest of the corporate Democrat party, as could literally any Republican with a spine, but unfortunately we're stuck with a party that won't act and a party whose only purpose is to block the other.

I still don't think you can distill the housing issue down to just 'Biden bad' though, so you should really do some introspection and see if your anger towards Biden might be blurring your viewpoint a little bit

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Consider that, maybe, the assumptions and projections that you put on to me. When did I say Biden is to blame for everything? When did I actually distill the housing issue down to just 'Biden bad' except by glibly mocking their PR teams attempt to spin good economic news as "Bidenomics". Remember, they're the ones that made up that term. I was just referencing it.

[–] fenynro@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When did I say Biden is to blame for everything?

I mean, sure, you didn't type that exact sentence but when you provided an itemized list of why Biden is to blame for each item in my original comment, it's not a huge leap of logic to think you blame Biden for these things.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago

I was just listing things Biden played a role in. Things he is partially to blame for, because he has not done everything he can to fight back.

Obviously he's not the king of America and can't just be blamed for everything, but I refuse to just say he's blameless because of that.

load more comments (61 replies)