this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
111 points (97.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43968 readers
1150 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Can't you say that of everything though ? Take rap for example, doesn't it fit in a larger medium that is the rapper's life ? You cant have a piece of art existing in a vacuum. If I listen to Gwyn's theme, am I liking it because I played the game or because it's intrinsically beautiful ? Does it make it less beautiful to me ? Does it matter ?
Maybe. I don't really care about artists and usually know nothing about them, so that aspect is usually irrelevant to me.
I didn't mean that the life of the artist is relevant, but lyrics are the reflection of an artist's existence, so even if you don't care about the artist themselves you're still listening to their lyrics.
That's why I say pieces don't just exist in a vacuum.
I mean you're right, they don't exist in a vaccum. But for me they might as well.
All I care is the song. Like if a specific pattern of sound waves makes my brain go "I enjoy that" then I like it. I really don't think any additional consideration are necessary or relevant.
Agreed. Which is also why I enjoy both instrumental and songs :P
Of course, that's valid.
But I think your initial point was that songs, like soundtracks, are part of a bigger medium. And I don't really agree with that. A good song is a good song on it's own but a good soundtrack in context may make a lousy song on it's own.
That wasn't my point at all (maybe quote me the part that sounded like it was) I think it was actually your point :P . I'm an avid and holistic enjoyer of good sound.
It was that part.
Adding an epic soundtrack to a movie scene transforms both pieces into a new expirence. I just don't see how adding the context of an artists life to a song is comparable to that.
Well in both cases it is the context. One is the movie, the other is the socio economical context of the rapper's life that people might relate to. That's all
Interessting, you talking more about relating to the artist directly. I guess in rap it's very common for many songs to tell very personal stories, so people related to the broader story that spans the entire artists work. I haven't really consider that. Good point.
For example there's one piece of classical music that especially touched me last year called "Prince Igor". I have no clue who made it, who interpreted it, what it's about or when or where it was written. All I know is that this particular melody resonates with me and I ended up listening to it on a loop for hours on end because it evoked a feeling of peace and joyful curiosity.
Just quoting one of my comments I made elsewhere in this thread:
Fair enough :)
Yeah, at the end of the day, music like any form of art (and some other form of craft that might be considered art) is there to provoke some kind of emotion in the recipient.