this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
381 points (82.9% liked)

memes

10393 readers
1886 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
381
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/memes@lemmy.world
 

is the man or bear thing rhetorically or optically the perfect feminist meme that is beyond criticism? no.

but is it leaps and bounds better at getting men to understand the material consequences of patriarchy on the physical and emotional health of women than that stupid “kill all men” meme from last decade? definitely.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

...........

Sure.

The original meme is about women feeling they are less threatened by a bear than a strange man, the bear might leave them alone or not be aggressive where a man would be more likely to. That men can be a threat in different ways.

Separately men very often discuss what animals they could beat in a fight. This results in a misunderstanding/disconnect between "who would you feel less threatened by" and "who would win in a fight", which I agree is not what the original meme of women "choosing the bear" is about, but it is a very similar dynamic that results in men explaining that you won't win a fight against a bear. Which, again, is not the point of the original meme indicating a feeling that a bear might be less likely to harm or threaten you, which is why it results in people talking past each other. (Kind of like right now...)

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

so you just conflated two random subjects because....?

Men don't 'very often discuss' what animals they can fight. get over yourself.

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"very often" is hyperbole, but if you've never had/heard of that discussion I would be surprised. But I don't think "men are misunderstanding the question" is a crazy take.

"who would win in a fight" and "who would you feel more threatened by" are by no means two "random" subjects, they are very closely related in theme and in most situations the answers would be interchangeable. And the conflation of the two closely related topics of conversation was my entire point.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

the only context I've ever discussed this is a horse sized chicken or 50 chicken sized horses.

the hilarious thing is, it's not about you, unless you're the kind of guy who makes women fear for their safety.