this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
1576 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

20986 readers
1665 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    Source

    alt-text

    I can't believe a paid OS needs a tool like this. Here's a GUI tool called OFGB (Oh Frick Go Back) to remove all the ads in Windows 11. It's understandable if a free OS or app needs ad support, but this is just crazy github.com/xM4ddy/OFGB

    [Screenshot Of a GUI Tool To Removes Ads From Various Places Around Windows 11]

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Couldn't M$ make corporations deal with it anyways? It's really not like they could just switch to Linux or Mac with their very specific BS piece of software of which every company has their own that runs on Windows only.

    [–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    They could try but anything over a medium size business likely has a specific contract with Microsoft and they probably have language preventing this kind of thing. I know my company does. And there would be a ton of pushback from any security org that knows what they are doing, since ads are a common vector for security incidents.

    Microsoft is already getting their money from the corpos, it's the 'freeloading' public they are trying to squeeze revenue from.

    [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Microsoft is already getting their money from the corpos, it's the 'freeloading' public they are trying to squeeze revenue from.

    Yeah, those bums who only paid for the software once.

    [–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

    If you saw an enterprise licensing agreement you'd know just how true this is. We pay for this shit over and over and over.

    [–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 2 points 5 months ago

    Pro, Enterprise and Education SKUs have less of these "features" enabled