this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
514 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59666 readers
2703 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 30 points 7 months ago (5 children)

This ban can't come soon enough. Fuck the CCP.

[–] endhits@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

"In my household, the only addictive spyware we use is made in the USA!!!"

Edit: everyone below me is proving my point exactly.

[–] ealoe@ani.social 8 points 7 months ago

Unironically yes, at least the US government is something we can openly criticize and attempt to change while living within its borders. Try criticizing the Chinese government from within China, let me know how that works out for you. I'll take homegrown American spyware any day.

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (5 children)

People love to repeat this, but US companies aren't coming from a place of hostile intent like china's special brand of tik tok for the states.

[–] KrapKake@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm not so sure about that, they seem pretty hostile to consumers and employees.

[–] endhits@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

They're both focused on profit. The only reason you see the other one as scary is because it's owned by the scary scary Chinese. Red scare all over again.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No tiktok is not focused on profit. It literally has one of the worst/non existent monetization systems.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yup, vine ripoff with some tweaks and the same monetization issue

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Case in point. Vine literally can't survive and so shouldn't TikTok. Unless of course it's getting propped up by a government with endless funds and not focused on profits.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Why is Chinese tiktok different than that in the states then?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Hmm, here's what Zuckerberg said when he launched Facebook:

According to SAI sources, the following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:

Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

Zuck: Just ask.

Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don't know why.

Zuck: They "trust me"

Zuck: Dumb fucks.

Brutal.

Could Mark have been completely joking? Sure. But the exchange does reveal that Facebook's aggressive attitude toward privacy may have begun early on.

They may not be trying to control elections (they certainly have their fingers in that pie too), but they're still hostile to users.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Why would it matter whether or not it's intentional, if the end effect is the same?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Blaming tiktok for bad parental choices?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not saying it's a good parental choice. But the ban can help the kids.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

I doubt it, parents will just move them to YouTube, Instagram, or some other platform. The TikTok ban is intended to limit misinformation by the CCP, and that doesn't really matter for this age of kids.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

No blaming the CCP on psyops on Americans.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, that will solve the problem

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wait, is there another psyops software the CCP has deployed in the US?

[–] BlueJayOakerson@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Probably plenty. Tik tok is just the biggest owned by a foreign government that also is showing pretty immediate extreme negative effects on children’s attention spans and learning capabilities.

But people are still gonna whine because they’re 25 year olds who need to watch 80 videos of unboxing shoes in 4 minutes . That’s really the only pro tik tok argument there is.

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

It sets a pretty chilling precedent that non-American competition can be forced to sell to Americans for (insert arbitrary reason here).

I am in favor of TikTok at least becoming restricted to adults only if not outright banned, just warning about the consequences of doing it this way.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's owned by the CCP who is currently trying to undermine our election. It tried to do it in Taiwan where I currently live.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's owned by the CCP who is currently trying to undermine our election

Not that this may not be true, but the USA undermines it's own foundation of democracy

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

While the US government is not perfect, it still is OUR own government. The CCP is a literal adversary.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So it's ok when Republicans undermine democracy... As long as they are not Chinese, got it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jorp@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Only Western manipulation please!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I use TikTok routinely. I actually spend time on Chinese parts of TikTok, because I know a little Chinese. I’ve seen content that the CCP would be very much opposed to - including discussions of the Tank Man from Tiananmen Square and homosexuality in Chinese history.

TikTok has censorship certainly, but it’s more targeted towards the Gaza conflict.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I use TikTok routinely.

Your experience is different from other experience. That's the main issue. They are and can target specific people in specific groups and in specific regions. You seeing this content just means you're not important enough for them to target.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

As can/do Facebook and every other social media platform. But I find it hard to take this idea that TikTok is an arm of the CCP seriously when I routinely discuss Ughyur Muslims and Tiananmen square with folks, and see depictions of Chairman Mao as Pooh Bear.

The more shady shit is the shop and how every third video is an unlabeled ad. TikTok wants to make money first and foremost. I don’t think TikTok is some force for good in the world, but what they are doing is no different from what Meta and Google are doing.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Tiktok has one of the worse/non existent monetization programs. Its clearly not important to them how bad it is.

My extended family in Taiwan would routinely see fake news on Tiktok during the Taiwan elections.

That's the thing. You don't know. Nobody knows except the CCP. That's the problem.

load more comments (2 replies)