this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
353 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
2688 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It started with notebooks, but that wasn’t the master plan.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Longer doesn't work because it has to fit in existing bags people have. Thickening it won't work because reviewers will then complain it's too thick.

I have a Toshiba laptop from around 2012 which has a slide-out optical drive. To me, it's thick but not too thick; it's just right. If we could return to that size, I think we'd be good. It'd also support better cooling (my Framework 13 with an i7-1280P gets hot, and there just isn't enough space for a bigger cooler). Reviewers over the past 10 years have pushed for thinner and thinner, and we gave up too much in the meantime.

Same goes for screen bezels and built in webcams. All else being equal, a cam with a bigger sensor is better because it can capture more light. Thin screen bezels force a small webcam, and thus your laptop has a shittier camera than a 10 year old smartphone.

In both cases, I don't think actual customers care all that much past a certain point. Reviewers have been deducting stars for a slightly thicker case or a slightly thicker bezel than other models on the market, and customers just go along with it.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Thickening it won't work because reviewers will then complain it's too thick.

I've used thicker laptops for years and had no problem whatsoever with them in that time.

I suppose that there's some theoretical thickness where a laptop becomes unergonomic, but my desktop's keyboard is far thicker than my laptop's, and it's got no constraints other than being ergonomic.

Is someone using some kind of incredibly-thin carrying case? I haven't seen that. I throw my laptop in a laptop backpack. It could be probably at least three times thicker and still fit in that.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago

Thick isn't a problem for bags (up to a point). It's reviewers complaining about it and deducting stars that's the problem.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't think people looking at Framework care too much about reviewers. They're targeting DIY enthusiasts, which are also the type that'll probably be reading the measurements and whatnot themselves.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The do have to source the same parts as the rest of the industry. This is why, for example, they can't have a socketable laptop CPU. Those don't exist anymore, and Framework is too small to afford a custom part from Intel or AMD.

Same with batteries. A thicker laptop battery may not even exist.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yup, but maybe they'll get there. Valve was able to get a "custom" chip for their Steam Deck, so it's possible Framework could get big enough to get socketable CPUs. But yeah, the priority there should be incredibly low, since replacing the entire motherboard is acceptable (at least to me).

I'm guessing batteries are a bit less expensive to order custom since there are so many slightly different form factors among various devices. If it was prohibitively expensive, I'd expect to see more standardization.