this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
641 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2726 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Brazil, Germany, Spain and South Africa sign motion for fairer tax system to deliver £250bn a year extra to fight poverty and climate crisis

The world’s 3,000 billionaires should pay a minimum 2% tax on their fast-growing wealth to raise £250bn a year for the global fight against poverty, inequality and global heating, ministers from four leading economies have suggested.

In a sign of growing international support for a levy on the super-rich, Brazil, Germany, South Africa and Spain say a 2% tax would reduce inequality and raise much-needed public funds after the economic shocks of the pandemic, the climate crisis and military conflicts in Europe and the Middle East.

They are calling for more countries to join their campaign, saying the annual sum raised would be enough to cover the estimated cost of damage caused by all of last year’s extreme weather events.

“It is time that the international community gets serious about tackling inequality and financing global public goods,” the ministers say in a Guardian comment piece.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 89 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Uh, why not 99%, and you get a framed certificate congratulating you for winning capitalism?

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 43 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When you get to 1 billion your wealth resets but you get exclusive skins

[–] YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So they’ll be playing on a higher difficulty?

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Same difficulty everyone else plays, which yeah it's a lot higher than theirs

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

100% on all wealth above, say, a quarter of a billion dollars and all income that would bring you above that threshold.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nah dude. If they hit a billion dollars, you take all their wealth, reset them back to level one, put a star next to their name and tell them to do it again. They'll appreciate the sense of pride and accomplishment that comes with a second run.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sorta like New Game Plus but without the plus? I like it!

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

It'd be hilarious to hear shit heels like Elon Musk talk about how they "earned" their wealth and then be completely unable to do it again.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

I'm kinda happy with 75%, maybe we could bump it up to 90 or so but at 75% wealth and revenue taxation billionaires would need to multiply their pot by 16x every year to maintain their wealth... that's pretty unrealistic do everyone north of a billion would quickly trend to a billion - that number should ideally be lower (I think ten million or a number like that is a perfectly reasonable effective wealth cap) but that was the reference in the article.