this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
92 points (97.9% liked)

Canada

7218 readers
367 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tenant David Siscoe still owes more than $43,000 after being dunned by CRA for foreign landlord’s failure to pay

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vector@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What a wild arrangement. I could be missing something, but from an outsider’s perspective it seems absolutely f***ing bonkers that the person who is making the payment is able to be held responsible for the tax component in any circumstance, rather than the person who is receiving the income.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The only way this makes sense is as a punitive measure against foreign landlords, where the tenant (as the tax payer) gets some measure of ownership over the property, which doesn't seem to be the case.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

That would make sense. This current thing is one of the dumbest, most citizen-hostile laws I have ever seen, and I am saying that stuck in the US.

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

rather than the person who is receiving the income.

Yes, this seems deeply fucked up.

From the article:

He also didn’t know that tenants renting from a non-resident are required to withhold and remit 25 per cent of their rent to CRA each month, unless they have a property manager doing it for them, or if the non-resident has made alternate arrangements to pay their taxes.

Why would Canadian law require that? I've never heard of a country forcing people to pay other people's income taxes outside of countries that still have forced inheritance of debt, like South Korea. Makes absolutely no sense. As in this case, the requirement about non-residents is inane, because the renter has no way to assess resident status.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Well they need the foreign buyers to keep the housing bubble going but they can't collect tax from them.