this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
321 points (86.7% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2238 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don’t blame them. Ukraine needs to take the war to Russia to win.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hswolf@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Seems I'm getting downvoted. Just to be clear, I condemn war and armed conflicts, If i could make so, no guns would ever be fired.

My point is, it's pointless to argue about the "should be" or "could be", I'm just stating the actual, current state of matters.

There's ALWAYS a winner, in fact, If a war started, someone is already winning, be It one of the involved parties, be It a guns supplier or a manufacturing plant making tanks.

It's naive to think that, people with power to decide what to do in a war, will prioritize a "good and moral war", over getting what they want from It.

Maybe you and I can't see any advantage over an attack and label It stupid, but it is what it is, and maybe the actual intent is not clear to us.

Anyways, war is bad, but don't be naive.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If a country's wartime decisions are made by people who benefit solely from death and destruction, then that country lost before the war even began. I don't see that being the case with the defenders in this conflict, Ukraine.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] hswolf@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I beg to differ: Adnan Khashoggi, a famous arms dealer, considered one the richest mans of the 1980s, active on the Iran-Contra affair. Viktor Bout, famous russian arms dealer active on the FARC. Sir Basil Zaharoff, greek arms dealer active on the Balkan Wars

And these are just a few most notorious ones.

As I said, when a war starts, someone is already winning, it's a sad but true reality.