this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
96 points (91.4% liked)

World News

32379 readers
565 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml -4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Name one. One actually concrete form of democracy that would work better.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Whatever its called that cuba does where national representation is organized and chosen at the local level. Idk im not a political scientist.

But also name ten that are worse

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml -5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Bu what metric does that system work though? It’s hard to judge it because the info is all unreliable and the government doesn’t share data. We don’t know how bad or good wealth inequality is there.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago

I answered your question but you didn't answer mine.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

By what metric does the US system work?

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Standard of living is relatively high in the U.S.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is that because of bourgeois representative democracy, or because of the imperialist exploitation of the global south?

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

How do you define "working"? Otherwise I don't know how you're measuring it. Would you say that a system that allows for literally one of the most unpopular genocides in history is "working"? Or a system that is working overtime to increase income and wealth disparity rather than reduce it? Is that working? I certainly wouldn't but I'm guessing you think that's working swell