this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
132 points (79.7% liked)

Technology

34987 readers
404 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Auzy@beehaw.org -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

There is a massive GitHub API which you probably already aren't using. And now you want them to release the source code which you also won't look at?

If they open source the code, what contributions would you make? How many contributions have you made to the Lemmy code? How many with vs code?

How would it benefit open source projects given that GitHub hosting is free for open source? How would it benefit GitHub?

Would you host your own GitHub repo when you can host it for free (which it will be for open source) on GitHub or other services anyway

Some projects don't really benefit from open source.

If it's a big thing, host your own using an open source project. Compete against GitHub.

But calling me a shill isn't really an effective argument. I have contributed to a few open source projects in the past and released some of my own.

I don't feel like forcing companies to open source their projects is the way. Open source needs to win on it's own merits. And plenty of open source projects have (the Linux kernel as an example).

Have you contributed anything to githubs competitors? That might be a place to start. Because at the moment, there aren't any issues with GitHub that open sourcing would address. Microsoft don't need the additional resources

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

So many ignorant assumptions (first and main one being that I and others aren't interested, and actively using and contributing to FLOSS forges) it's not even worth arguing. Blocked.

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There's a reason GitHub is the largest service lol

You need to sell services based on their advantages rather than the politics. The reality is, github allows projects to be very easily migrated to other services anyway.

Using something because it's open source isn't helpful at all if it doesn't work with your workflow easily

Productivity is more important to the success of open source than anything else.

I know this, because a project of mine died because we wasted too much time on infrastructure

Developers don't need access to the GitHub source to do their job, and there is no advantage to anyone.

In fact, if they distribute the code, it simply reduces the incentive for Microsoft to improve it, and the only ones who will step are, are shit companies like Oracle