Technology

34977 readers

169 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

132

GitHub Is Not Open Source, A Rant (listed.to)

submitted 7 months ago by juliette@pawb.social to c/technology@lemmy.ml

111 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The fact that GitHub is owned by Microsoft alone makes it not open-source.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Microsoft has developed many open-source projects. The view of Microsoft as some kind of anti-open-source crusader is 20 years out of date.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 8 points 7 months ago

I will now attempt to invalidate your opinion by parroting the words "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish". :^)

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So has Google, they've done the Chromium browser, but everyone on Lemmy sees that so called "open-source project" with suspicion.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

There's quite a series of leaps of logic here.

Because Google (not Microsoft) released a project under the BSD license (an open source license) but "everyone on Lemmy" doesn't think it's open source, therefore a hosting site owned by Microsoft (not Google) is not "open source."

I'm not even sure what is meant by GitHub being "open source." It's a hosting provider, not an actual piece of software. The site itself doesn't have a source license. The individual repositories can have licenses, which can be whatever the user who created the repository sets it to be - including open source licenses. Do you mean GitHub Desktop? Microsoft released that under the MIT license. And you don't need GitHub Desktop to use GitHub anyway.

[–] 4z01235@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

GitHub is a git hosting provider, but it also has its own service software for all the peripherals - organizations, issues, pull requests, all the user account management stuff, etc. AFAIK those parts are mostly/all proprietary.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

So we've moved from "GitHub is not open source" to "GitHub has some support software for peripheral features that is not open-source?" I'm definitely failing to see the rant-worthiness of it at this point. It's certainly not monopolistic, platforms like GitLab and Bitbucket also provide these features. And I'd bet that some of them have their own proprietary software to support these things too.

[–] 4z01235@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"We" haven't moved anywhere, I just chimed in for the first time with my interpretation of what the other person was talking about. Jeez.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"We" as in the conversation as a whole. You joined an ongoing thread.

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Insanely useful info. Thanks.