this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
810 points (98.4% liked)

science

15020 readers
275 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

48 seconds. I predict a glut of helium. balloons for everyone

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 28 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Like it has been for the past 30 years (which, I assume, was the joke here.)

If fusion research was funded adequately we'd probably have it by now, but I don't know if it's the energy lobby or what that means that it's chronically underfunded. An actually working fusion reactor design would bring about such an upheaval in the energy markets that I wouldn't be surprised if plutocrats had a hand in making sure the research receives orders of magnitude less money than it should.

[–] malloc@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Existing energy conglomerates (ie, oil and gas) probably send their army of lobbyists around the world to spread FUD about fusion. Thus minimal funding. πŸͺ¦

[–] TheWoozy@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Not while fusion is 30 years away. They'll wait until it's closer to 2 years.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Maybe. We all (here) wish fusion power was funded better and understand how useful it could be for humanity if we can make it happen, but ….

  • yesterday I read about the Stellerator using 3D printed parts
  • in this thread, someone commented on using ai to drive containment
  • I’m sure teams must be using the latest materials.

It’s quite possible that we would have always needed the rest of the world to catch up