this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
1810 points (97.7% liked)
Technology
59666 readers
2624 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I hate this but refunding with a little extra seems fair enough. Would be better if you had the option to refund to your card though.
Yeah I somewhat agree, I'm torn though. It's probably outside Amazon's control. Licencing issue or something? But I'd be demand a refund to me account, not a gift card.
That's true. It's in Amazon's best interest to avoid a situation like this since it makes customers unhappy. When you buy something digitally, it's expected that you get to keep the purchase forever (or at least until the digital store you bought it at goes under). Undoing a purchase like this (assuming it wasn't one of those "too good to be true" purchases where the thing was accidentally discounted or something) would break trust and run the risk of souring the customer's relationship with Amazon. Stores typically only do this (undo a purchase and issue "apology money") if they absolutely need to.
To you. To the state of Texas, a "person can use deadly force to protect tangible, movable property from another’s imminent commission of theft during the nighttime or to prevent another who is fleeing immediately after committing theft during the nighttime and is escaping with property if the person reasonably believes the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means"
That sounds like it fits the second case exactly, I'd never be able to recover that movie. I'mma need jeffie b to drop by my place, apologize for obstructing justice and calmly await said use of deadly force. I'll use the gift card to buy the ammo, thanks.
What you quotes specifies "tangible" as part of the property requirement. Also the second half requires that the thief be "fleeing" which Amazon emailing you directly does not fit...The rest of your comment is just unhinged...
Yeeeee hawww partner, you best not be removing my access to Scream (1996) from my Amazon Prime account lest you find yourself at the end of my six shooter.
Yeah, doesn't sound exactly like that at all, but feel free to try to go shoot an Amazon employee and see if the court agrees with you.