Asklemmy

43945 readers

672 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

171

To everyone who hates the concepts of landlords and rent, what counts as being a landlord? (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 7 months ago by tkk13909@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

303 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Does having an AirBNB setup make someone deserving of the guillotine or does that only apply to owners of multiple houses? What about apartments?

Please explain your reasoning as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

What if you need to move interstate for work for a year. Are you meant to sell your house? And incur all the selling and buying costs? Are you meant to leave it vacant for a year? Or are you meant to let people stay in it for free?

It makes sense to rent it out for the year, and rent yourself in the other state.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

You're right; lots of shitty edge cases exist. If you are trading 1 for 1 it's not the core issue.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

The long term solution to this is high quality public housing allowing people to move when needed. It's a bit of a pipe dream in our current world, but if we are talking edge cases, I can be idealistic.

Ownership isn't for everyone, that's okay, but profiting from a basic need for another human, shelter, is immortal. We should be a society that provides basic needs to people without allowing others to exploit them for profit.

I am not saying everyone must own, and you can't rent, but it's the profiteering I have a problem with, not the need for someone to live or move.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Be careful with this dangerous logic. You’ll get pitchforked.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 1 points 7 months ago

This is the internet, absolutes or gtfo!