this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
363 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2917 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Looks expensive. The grey ones are the broken ones.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigLgame@lemy.lol 18 points 7 months ago (3 children)

All the people arguing for nuclear, are you sure Texas is best place to handle that? I'm fine with nuclear as long as they have a reasonable plan to store the waste, but Texas is horrible at managing anything energy related.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah. I'm not normally an anprim, but for Texas....

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Tbh, I think America in general might be a little too obsessed with personal freedom for us to transfer the entire country over to nuclear energy.

Successful nuclear programs require actual collective work for long term viability. We would need to actually give administrative powers to an agency like the nuclear regulation commission that supercedes the authority of individual states.

Otherwise its just going to be like 30 years of ironing out NIMBY state legislation before anything gets built, just like the deep storage facility we've been "building" since the 80s.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You know what the plan to store a lot of nuclear waste in America is? Bury it in west nowhere, Texas.