Asklemmy

43945 readers

626 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

171

To everyone who hates the concepts of landlords and rent, what counts as being a landlord? (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 7 months ago by tkk13909@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

303 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Does having an AirBNB setup make someone deserving of the guillotine or does that only apply to owners of multiple houses? What about apartments?

Please explain your reasoning as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure, let's assume that's true. The difference though is, I own the property. I get something out of the deal other than a temporary roof over my head - something I would argue is a human right.

If I were renting, I would be paying all those same costs, plus a profit margin - and I wouldn't own anything at all. Someone else gets to cash out on the investment that I entirely paid for.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

You misunderstand. The comparison I'm trying to make is this:

Scenario 1: You own a home mortgage-free. You pay maintenance costs and taxes on that property.
Scenario 2: You own the value of the same home in cash. You rent a home to live in.

How high does rent need to be before it becomes a better financial choice to choose scenario 1 over scenario 2? The break-even point is around the price where you would end up paying off the entire value of the home over ten years.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

There are some interesting scenarios I've seen contracted out that you might be interested in.

Scenario: Co-op housing, you lease a lot with housing (based on your desired price point) with a 100-year lease. You may "purchase" a portion of the capital that the co-op housing has on your leased property (lets say 100k value property). The invested money can be used for loans or other means (like how capital can be used for leverage) through the co-op (think State-employee-credit-unions which are co-ops themselves). Any interest or value accrued while maintaining that lease is passed onto the signer of that lease. Aka, 100k property sold 20 years later for 200k you receive a 100k "buyout" from the co-op if you're leaving.

Heavily regulated with plenty of stipulations of course so nefarious actors and "flippers" don't buy. The co-op retains the property for future housing even if you die at 118. Have seem family clauses so it can be passed down as well. There's just so many versatile and victimless situations that can be created which have the community and the individual in mind for fairness.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago

Ahh, gotcha. That's fair, then.