Asklemmy

43956 readers

1043 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

How Would You Handle Students Cheating? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by wuphysics87@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I gave my students a take home exam over spring break. (This is normal where I teach) One of the questions was particulary difficult. It came down to a factor of three in the solution. That factor inexplicably appeared with no justification on many of their exams. I intend to have the students I suspect of cheating come to my office to solve the problem on the board. What would you do?

Edit: I gave them the Tuesday before spring break until the Thursday after. I didn't want it to be right before or right after.

When I say normal I mean giving take home exams.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] deezbutts@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Most take-home exams specifically state whether you're allowed to use other sources or cooperate. If not, many course syllabi or even campus codes of conduct have onerous defaults.

Instead of ragging on op for adhering to practices they may have had no hand in mandating, we should try to help them.

Having been on both sides of such academic misconduct, if your hands are tied in terms of the assignment parameters, I think reissuing solo retests is fine. This is likely a chronic issue though, and I'd be curious to know if you have any options in next steps should anyone fail.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Instead of ragging on op for adhering to practices they may have had no hand in mandating, we should try to help them.

I am. I'm telling them this is a stupid way to test students and not to do it. I doubt their institute mandates take home exams, so never doing them again is a great solution to prevent this from ever happening again.

I also think solo retests are fine, hence the suggestion of proctoring an exam. Because that's what they should do in the first place, if they want to test the students knowledge.

And if the students fail the exam, they fail the exam.

I'll go one further and ask what the advantages of a take-home even are? What's the use case for them that isn't "less work for the teacher at the cost of quality"?