Music

8036 readers

85 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ruud@lemmy.world

cnx@slrpnk.net

felixwhynot@lemmy.world

EliYeet@lemmy.world

229

How are musicians supposed to survive on $0.00173 per stream? (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 6 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/music@lemmy.world

111 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] min_fapper@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Actually while typing that out I thought more about the technical architecture of such distributed alternative streaming service that pays artists fairly, and it does sound like it could be fun to build.

But everyone in the fediverse already knows how difficult/impossible it is to get the average person to switch to open source software. It would most likely be a waste of time.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Here's a person who knows way more about the music industry than all of us in this thread out together. And he's thought a lot about this, too

Not so much the fediverse side of it, but the legal, and financial/jobs side of things.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Here's

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I don't think you can get people to agree on what's "fair" but it's always fun to think about. What would your fair payment scheme look like?

[–] vardogor@mander.xyz 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)