this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
49 points (96.2% liked)

Public Health

371 readers
1 users here now

For issues concerning:

🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.

Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)

Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
otter@mander.xyz
otter@lemmy.ca
49
Google Street View reveals how built environment correlates with risk of cardiovascular disease (medicalxpress.com)
submitted 7 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/publichealth@mander.xyz
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Using AI to conjure correlations out of data seems more like speculating about miasma and dust parasites to me. I suppose if we can drill down from the wealth of correlations we generate to find something actually useful, that's potential, but good lord the examples in the article are not inspiring. I think if anything, the potential here is identifying problem areas and targeting solutions at them, something that actual people have to do currently, rather than establishing any link between built environment and heart disease that we don't already understand, because, you know, it's not 1256 anymore.

[–] Minotaur@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I just don’t really think that this is your field

[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 2 points 7 months ago

It's precisely because this is my field (public built environments) that I'm so skeptical of claims based on dubious statistical relationships. I'm willing to be convinced, of course, but if you had to go into a meeting with public officials and make suggestions, these are the sorts of questions you should be expecting. I am not convinced by the public health angle, so far, anyway.