World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
We also don't call Nazis victims when they face retaliation for their crimes against humanity either.
We also generally don't condone retaliation against civilians for the actions of the government. We didn't punish all Germans for what the Nazis did. Let's not punish civilians for what Israel's doing.
Otherwise? You're closer to those Nazis than not.
Civilians don't typically hang out in occupied territory.
If you believe that the murder of all Israelis is just, come out and actually say it. Don't be shy now.
Oh, come on now. And what, exactly, do you want to happen the evil Zionists?
Sure, it'd be nice if there was a cute kumbaya moment, but absent that, if Israelis have no desire to leave, what do you want to happen to them?
The implication of your proposition is that only genocide can decide this.
Your assumption is ludicrous and fascist. It says everything that needs to be said about your beliefs. By assuming only bloodshed is the solution, you remove the responsibility for you to face the genocide you are supporting.
I would have a criminal investigation and follow-up to this genocide similar to the Nuremberg Trials.
I want the people responsible locked up for life, and I want freedom for the people of Palestine.
So how about you? Can you honestly answer what exactly you want out of this?
Okay, so who are the people responsible? A handful of leaders? Most of the original Zionists have been dead for a long time. Is it literally every single Israeli? What exactly does this freedom and justice look like? I don't think locking up Netanyahu and Ben Gvir would exactly satisfy the Palestinian cause, so ultimately, you have the situation of millions of Israelis, most of which were born there, who do not want to leave and will only do so by force.
So, what do you want? The forced removal of all Israelis? That's not an inconsistent position given your general perspective, but if that's the case, come out and actually say it.
You've said a lot of nice abstract things about wanting freedom and justice, and very little actual concrete info about the situation on the ground.
It's sadly ironic that these people who go "you don't think killing all of them is justified? You're just a genocidal Nazi yourself!" don't realize they're acting the exact same way as Netanyahu and the IDF. If you don't support their absolutist violence, you're an antisemite who wants Hamas to kill all Israelis.
They'll make all sorts of excuses, but at the end of the day, they use the exact same underlying ideology/argument that is being used to justify genocide.
It's just amusing that these people know that they can't openly say "I think all Israelis should be either removed or murdered", so they'll just heavily imply it without having the balls to actually own up to their position.
Speaking as someone who would not at all be upset to see a rocket happen to fall on Netanyahu and Ben Gvir.
It's fairly obvious who's a bad actor and who actually wants peace. I mean, if someone says "it's wrong to kill children, but", that tells you everything you need to know.
Frankly, it's the same behavior as conservatives. They look at the people affected and then decide how they feel about the act. They don't universally condemn the act.
Gish gallop.
You made an absolute out of genocide and then kited right past the fact your original stance was an absolute acceptance of genocide despite the obvious other answers.
You will not stop clawing to justify the genocide, I don't care to continue debating genocidal nazis.
You're the one who seems to be incapable of actually stating a concrete desire that isn't the violent removal or murder of all Israeli citizens, but by all means, tell me how I'm the genocidal one.
Is an Israeli child born in Tel Aviv a genocidal Nazi? Is it okay if they're captured by Hamas?
I really hope your response is an unequivocal no. We don't kill people for the sins of their fathers. We can expect them to make things right and work towards equity and peace, but they shouldn't be punished.
Part of the issue with this conflict is how long Israel has now existed and is established. There are people who have nothing to do with the Zionists. They shouldn't be punished for what the Zionists have done and are doing. There will never be peace if you continue to kill people for what their ancestors did.
How many Israeli children starved to death yesterday?
Nazis had children too and didn't justify the actions of the Nazis.
Would it be justified to bomb the homes of the Nazis to kill them if it also meant killing their children?
I dont think I have to answer that to say it is wrong to starve children to death.
What if it's Nazis who are starved in the process? What if you're starving an entire German city in WW2 to out the Nazis and kill them? Would you say the same thing?
Somehow, I think you're going to deflect once again and call me a genocide apologist because I'm asking if you disavow violence against innocents in all circumstances. I suppose I'll wait for that response before I say anything else.
Yeah they do? It's how governments and groups try to legitimize their occupation and claims. It's how the USSR operated in Eastern Europe with Russification.
That does not make it acceptable to kill the civilians. Russian citizens in Crimea are not enemy combatants. They can be evicted if they won't peacefully integrate with the rightful owning country, but they shouldn't be raped or killed.
Note that this is very different from the Israeli settlers. They exist in a grey area because they are committing violence against the Palestinians there and generally being awful shitheads and active colonizers.
Yea, if an invading force is slaughtering people to conquer your home, they are no longer just civilians. They are active combatants.
Do you not see any distinction between the actual military forces invading and slaughtering your people versus civilians who are living nearby?
I'm stating the difference between an invader and a civilian distinctly.
Your inability to address what I've said isn't my problem.
You're being clear as mud.
Let me just ask unequivocally -- do you think every Israeli person, regardless of where they live in the country, is an invader and a legitimate target?