this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1124 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

72933 readers
3129 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Whats the source on it being about as bad?
It releases methane, yes.
We don't have to do hydro. Wind and the Sun are already plenty enough.

[–] nga105@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

UNs IPCC Reports https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/Chapter-5-Hydropower-1.pdf See fig 5.15. The outliers are the concern (and yes, it's pretty much methane)

Edit: I reread the parent comment, the above won't address what you asked for, but is interesting nonetheless so I'll leave it

[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

Thank you for the paper.
This does indeed clarify exact numbers that i didnt have.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy

Nuclear produces the least emissions over it's life cycle and has a safety rating that flip flops with solar depending on how they want to classify accidents in construction and preparation.

If you want a sustainable, clean and reliable future, your power grid needs Wind, Solar and Nuclear. There is absolutely no reason to exclude Nuclear Power from any green energy plan.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

OWID is probably the shittiest source on this topic. It's funded by Bill Gates, who also directly funds nuclear power companies.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I hear a lot of people trash talking OWID but never see anyone disputing the data or otherwise proving it's wrong. And the information it presents on a whole lines up with other information provided by other research, surveys and data points.