Asklemmy

43984 readers

789 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

168

People with experience working in and around municipal water infrastructure: Do you drink tap water? Are there times when you do not? (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago by j4k3@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This question is obviously intended for those that live in places where tap water is "safe to drink."

I live in Southern California, where I'm at the end of a long chain of cities. Occasionally, the tap smells of sulfur, hardness changes, or it tastes... odd. I'm curious about the perspective of people that are directly involved and their reasoning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you're fine. The issue with flint was because they moved away from the supply that you're on.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

they moved away from the supply that you’re on.

As in, that's what they did before the massive catastrophe that was "everybody gets cancer in the everything", to paraphrase, right?

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Correct.

Flint was on the Detroit water supply, and then tried to save money by switching to one that the pipes couldn't handle, which damaged the protective coating on the pipes and let lead leach into the water.
After the coating was damaged there was no real way to fix it that was better than "replace the pipes", which was on the agenda anyway.

Lead pipes are bad, but they're typically safe enough that it's not an emergency due to the coating. It's a worldwide effort to replace lead pipes with other materials that's usually happening roughly inline with the usual service replacement schedule, but some places are going faster because of public concern or just a good opportunity. (My local water supply got the budget to do it while doing a different project, so it took two or three times as long, but happened a few decades early and was much cheaper, then when Flint happened they looked great by being able to respond to questions by saying they started years ago and are almost done)