this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
80 points (97.6% liked)
Asklemmy
43968 readers
820 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Victoria 3 on launch. First game I turned Finland into the richest country on earth by capita is 30 years.
How does it compare to vic2? I still love vic2.
Victoria 3 still isn't a good game, but I agree with it as my answer to OP's question. It scratches the same itch as Cookie Clicker while being about a million times more convoluted.
Victoria 3 is the game I keep tabs on the news feed for - it's getting better (mostly - slowing down economic growth is just far less fun) but not there yet... and the potential is amazing.
Never played Vicky but I'm a big fan of CK2 which I imagine ticks most of the same clunky paradox grand strategy that's horrible to learn but will suck up hundreds of wonderful hours of your life boxes?