this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1124 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3015 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's only stealing if you make it generate the copyrighted art and claim it as yours. Otherwise, it's not any different than artists being inspired by existing art.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

literally, no finding or law supports the claim you have made, but there are several cases that have been ruled contrary to your statement. now sure, these didn't pertain directly to AI, but they did pertain to the argument of an artist "being inspired by existing art"