this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
253 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

72323 readers
3706 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not surprised that a for-profit company for wanting to avoid bad press by censoring stuff like that. There's no profit in sharing that info, and any media attention over it would be negative.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No one's going after hammer manufacturers because their hammers don't self-destruct if you try to use one to clobber someone over the head.

[–] pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but people generally understand hammers. Llms? Not so much

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one's going after computer manufacturers or OS vendors because people use computers to commit cybercrime. I doubt most people could explain how an OS or motherboard works.

[–] Akrenion@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of poluticians want hardwarelevel backdoors. It's been declared unconstitutional quite some times in different countries but they are trying.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

That would be soooo bad, almost as bad as making a law against encryption

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

A better example would be something like The Anarchist Cookbook. Possession is illegal in some places.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I'm more surprised that a for-profit company is willing to use a technology that is able to randomly spew out unwanted content, incorrect information, or just straight gibberish, in any kind of public facing capacity.

Oh, it let them save money on support staff this quarter. And fixing it can be an actionable OKR for next quarter. Nevermind.