this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
253 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59666 readers
2624 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 52 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm not surprised that a for-profit company for wanting to avoid bad press by censoring stuff like that. There's no profit in sharing that info, and any media attention over it would be negative.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

No one's going after hammer manufacturers because their hammers don't self-destruct if you try to use one to clobber someone over the head.

[–] pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

True, but people generally understand hammers. Llms? Not so much

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No one's going after computer manufacturers or OS vendors because people use computers to commit cybercrime. I doubt most people could explain how an OS or motherboard works.

[–] Akrenion@programming.dev 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A lot of poluticians want hardwarelevel backdoors. It's been declared unconstitutional quite some times in different countries but they are trying.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

That would be soooo bad, almost as bad as making a law against encryption

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

A better example would be something like The Anarchist Cookbook. Possession is illegal in some places.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

I'm more surprised that a for-profit company is willing to use a technology that is able to randomly spew out unwanted content, incorrect information, or just straight gibberish, in any kind of public facing capacity.

Oh, it let them save money on support staff this quarter. And fixing it can be an actionable OKR for next quarter. Nevermind.