this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
784 points (98.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8625 readers
1003 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's well known that server infrastructure and software development is free

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I never said those things were free. I did say the platform is good, but their income is from the games sold on the platform that other people made.

I don't know what metric would properly capture money/time spent on infrastructure and servers, but I don't think it's "money per head" if that money is from games sold and doesn't strictly relate to how good their platform performs.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

If games company's could make more money by not releasing on Steam, they would. The fact that they accept the 30% cut means that Steam is in fact leading to more sales for those developers and thus earns its cut. No one HAS to sell their product on Steam, PC's are a completely open marketplace