this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
852 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19062 readers
3863 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Drinking lead can damage people's brains, but Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach opposes a plan to remove lead water pipes.

In their letter, the attorneys general wrote, “[The plan] sets an almost impossible timeline, will cost billions and will infringe on the rights of the States and their residents – all for benefits that may be entirely speculative.”

Kobach repeated this nearly verbatim in a March 7 post on X (formerly Twitter).

Buttigieg responded by writing, “The benefit of not being lead poisoned is not speculative. It is enormous. And because lead poisoning leads to irreversible cognitive harm, massive economic loss, and even higher crime rates, this work represents one of the best returns on public investment ever observed.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Here's something wild: it was only banned for residential use. As long as the paint is labeled 'for industrial use only', manufacturers can go crazy with the lead. Despite the common misconception of lead exposure via paint being primarily due to "eating paint chips", it's mostly due to the inhalation and ingestion of the dust formed by friction and the gradual breakdown of lead paint. To get to the point, living downwind of any business that still utilizes legal lead paint means you may be exposed to lead.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

To get to the point, living downwind of any business that still utilizes legal lead paint means you may be exposed to lead.

I wonder if there's any way to find out if you live near one of these businesses?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's an easy, not very legal way. Head to the Home Depot and buy some lead test strips, then take them and a pocketknife for some DIY paint sampling at the facility in question.

If the police find you, make sure you're white and aren't near any oak trees.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if there’s any way to find out if you live near one of these businesses?

There’s an easy, not very legal way. Head to the Home Depot and buy some lead test strips, then take them and a pocketknife for some DIY paint sampling at the facility in question.

Well I was thinking more along some kind of governmental website with a search ability, but sure I guess that would work too.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Well I was thinking more along some kind of governmental website with a search ability

I wish! There's no registration required for industrial use, so there's no registry to search.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I quick search turned up some accredited labs that will send you an at home collection kit for air sampling.

It doesn't seen particular cheap; $100 per kit, minimum order three kits

I'm not going to link to them since this was a really quick search and do not want to come across as vouching for any particular lab.

If you're concerned, I suggest doing some indecent research on your options. Perhaps your state or locality has programs for testing.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’m not going to link to them since this was a really quick search and do not want to come across as vouching for any particular lab.

Please do link them. I don't think anyone would take you as a peddler for that company.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Do you live in a city that has buildings more than 50 years old? Is so, the answer is yes.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’m sure there are legitimate needs for leaded paint. Probably for environments where containing RFI or radiation are a concern.

I’d also think that it’s such a niche need that it probably has a cost premium and not something anybody would willingly choose to use over latex or oil paints.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Lead paint doesn't contain enough lead to significantly control radiation of any type. You need a sizable amount to block x-ray radiation: think about the thickness and weight of the vests radiation techs use as protection.

The lead is used as a pigment and helps to decrease dry time and to increase its durability, corrosion resistance, and fungicidal properties. Lead paint is quite cheap and is still used on outdoor structures like bridges, road markings, storage tanks, building exteriors, etc. Lead-free alternatives exist but aren't always as durable or are comparably durable but often more expensive. There are no applications of which I am aware that require lead paint. It's 100% a cost and convenience issue.

Only Nepal and the Philippines have enacted any meaningful control of industrial lead paint. The US reduced the allowed lead content about 15 years ago but lead based paint is still actively used.

P.s. I'm not just a crazy paint fanatic, I'm a paid, crazy paint fanatic - it's part of my job. Welcome to the EPA in the United States - better than nothing, but still industry's bitch.