this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
26 points (82.5% liked)

PC Gaming

8642 readers
481 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 33 points 8 months ago (2 children)

So, worse performance, more battery drain, windows, and same to higher price? Why would anyone buy this?

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What does your link have to do with this topic?

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They appear to be licensing all of their comments individually.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well... That's not narcissistic at all.

[–] greyfox@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's presumably to give you legal ground to sue if some corporation scrapes Lemmy content and uses it to train AI, or whatever other commercial purpose.

Hopefully if enough people do it they would consider the dataset too risky to use. They could try and parse out comments that have that license statement but if any get missed somehow they open themselves up to lawsuits.

That would force them to instead pay for content from somewhere that has a EULA forcing the users to hand over copyright regardless of what they put in their posts (i.e. Reddit).

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

No one else is going to paste that at the end of every comment they make. That's ridiculous.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I've seen several people do it already. Maybe not enough to scare off data harvesters, especially when they copy paste so precisely, but it's not a bad idea and not difficult to do. Perhaps claiming copyright in your about page would be enough?

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 8 months ago

IANAL but I really doubt it would make a difference to have that on every comment, on a profile, etc.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

Not one scraper is going to get scared off because of that link lol

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

They already use commercial copyright text. The courts need to figure out if they think it is fair use or not. If it is, their copyright notice is useless. If it isn't, their copyright notice is redundant.

[–] Hana@beehaw.org 9 points 8 months ago

I guess he’s trying to put a license on his comment, as if scrapers care.