this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
67 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

974 readers
49 users here now

A tech news sub for communists

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 13 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It would be cool if they do, but isn't solar power really efficient on the moon? Since there's no atmosphere to get in the way?

Not sure about the logic behind this.

[–] KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 8 months ago

The moon has very long days and night, so for the first power plant something that will work all the time instead of working for 2 weeks and having no power for another 2 is better. You can get a lot of power from solar panes on the moon but because of the longer nights batteries become even more of a problem.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 8 months ago

I'm guessing you can get a lot more power out of a compact reactor than from solar panels by weight. My guess would be that Russian and Chinese space agencies ran the basic numbers to decide whether this makes sense or not before making the announcement.

[–] RedColossus@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 8 months ago

Insert whynotboth.gif