Right to Repair

2784 readers

1 users here now

Whether it be electronics, automobiles or medical equipment, the manufacturers should not be able to horde “oem” parts, render your stuff useless if you repair it with aftermarket parts, or hide schematics of their products.

I Fix It Repair Manifesto

Summary article from I Fix It

Summary video by Marques Brownlee

Great channel covering and advocating right to repair, Lewis Rossman

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Engineer@discuss.tchncs.de

BrikoX@lemmy.zip

145

Oregon is about to sign — or veto — the strongest right-to-repair law yet (www.theverge.com)

submitted 2 years ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/right2repair@discuss.tchncs.de

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So long, parts pairing?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 62 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Dear reader, here are the important parts of the article:

It’s a big deal, because the Oregon law would be the first to ban “parts pairing,” a practice where companies can keep you from using components[.]

Similar to California’s right-to-repair law, the Oregon bill also requires companies to make the same parts, tools, and repair documents available to any owners that it offers to authorized repair shops, and without charging any more for them.

Finally, Apple is against the bill, so it's probably a good bill for right-to-repair.

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

ahh looks like it's the hardware equivalent of software unbundling

seems good in that case✨️

[–] raven@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Apple by this time next year: We need to epoxy the entire airspace inside the new iphone because.. waterproofing? Sure waterproofing I promise that's why we did that.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

That's assuming apple is feeling generous enough to be that level of kind kind to their consumers.