this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
1089 points (97.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gazter@aussie.zone 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As someone who knows that they know very little about git, this thread makes me think I'm not alone.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think advanced git knowledge, like RegEx, is the exception, while the norm is to know the tiny handful of day to day useful bits

[–] lhamil64@programming.dev 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

How is regex git knowledge? I guess you can use regular expressions with git grep but it's certainly not a git-oriented concept...

[–] MrRazamataz@lemmy.razbot.xyz 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

what. that's not what they said. they are comparing git knowledge to regex knowledge.

[–] Astongt615@lemmy.one 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah, thanks for the explanation. I too misunderstood the inflection.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't even know how to respond to this considering it has nothing to do with what I said...

[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There are at least two ways to parse your statement, and they interpreted it differently from your intention.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I guess, if you ignore the comma...

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 2 points 8 months ago

Could’ve written like this to avoid the ambiguity: “I think advanced git knowledge, just like RegEx, …”

[–] lhamil64@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Rereading it, I now understand what you meant. I interpreted the "like regex" as an example of advanced git knowledge. I'm not sure the comma helps make it unambiguous though.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah, reading it again and I can see that interpretation...

This is why you shouldn't rely on yourself alone for proofreading your writing, I probably could have read that a hundred times and not seen another way to read it without someone else pointing it out